Licensing Your Content to AI Companies? Here’s Why It’s a Bad Idea
Nov 8, 2024
If you’re a content creator and an AI company comes knocking with a licensing offer, you might be tempted. It sounds like easy money, right? A quick payout for access to your work, letting you cash in on the AI boom without breaking a sweat. But let’s be real—that’s a shortsighted move. Licensing your content to AI companies could cost you far more than you gain in the long run. If we take a look at history, plus where tech is going, the smartest move is actually holding onto control and building a strategy that aligns with AI’s future needs.
Here’s why licensing is shortsighted, how copyright history offers some valuable lessons, and why you’re better off preparing your content for the future of AI.
Copyright Law 101: Creators Have Always Gotten the Short End of the Stick
Copyright law originally aimed to give creators the power to control their work and make a fair profit. But every time a new technology came along—printing presses, radios, TVs—creators got swept up in waves of deals they barely understood, only to realize later they’d lost out big. Recording artists, for instance, signed away rights to their music without knowing how profitable it would become. And photographers who sold images to stock photo companies watched as the agencies raked in profits while their own payouts dwindled.
Now, AI companies want to license your work, not to distribute it as-is, but to absorb it into their models forever. They’re offering you a one-time payout to take your content and turn it into an endless supply of variations. With traditional licensing—say, for a song or an image—you could earn royalties every time it’s used. But in AI? Once your content is in the model, it’s done. The AI can generate derivatives forever, and you don’t get a dime beyond that first check.
Generative AI Is Playing by a Whole New Set of Rules
Let’s be clear: AI is different. These companies aren’t just “using” your content; they’re embedding it in their models. Licensing to an AI company isn’t like licensing to a magazine or a music streaming service. Once your work trains an AI, you lose control over how it’s used. The AI can create millions of versions inspired by your work, but you don’t see any revenue from it.
Imagine you’re an illustrator who sells a set of designs to an AI company for a one-time fee. The AI learns your style and churns out variations—thousands, maybe even millions of designs inspired by your work. You’ll never see another cent. In a traditional setup, every time your design was used, you’d earn royalties. With AI, it’s a one-and-done deal, and that’s a raw deal if you ask me.
A Smarter Play: Align Your Content for the Future of AI
Instead of cashing in quick with a license, there’s a smarter, long-term strategy here: align your content with how AI is going to evolve. Think back to the early days of the internet and the rise of SEO (search engine optimization). Content creators who learned to work with search engines—structuring content to appeal to Google’s algorithms—ended up building sustainable traffic and revenue streams that kept paying over time. Instead of fighting the system, they adapted to it.
Today, content creators can do something similar with AI. By building high-quality, unique, and valuable content, you’re setting yourself up to create recurring relationships with AI companies who need a steady supply of fresh, relevant data. You can demand ongoing access fees instead of a one-time payout, and AI companies will need your work to keep their models relevant.
Think Big: Content for New Modalities of Consumption
Just like the transition from physical media to digital and from web browsing to apps, the way people consume content is evolving again. We’re moving from browsers to AI-driven content delivery. In the near future, AI agents will generate personalized, just-in-time feeds for users, pulling in exactly what they need, when they need it. Imagine a world where users don’t browse for news or stories but have AI pull in real-time, customized feeds that fit their preferences perfectly.
If your content is ready for these new modalities, you’re setting yourself up to thrive in the AI age. Rather than licensing your work to an AI company and losing all control, you can position your content for just-in-time, AI-driven delivery models that charge per access or based on engagement. News outlets, for instance, could create subscription-based feeds that AI agents access on-demand, offering a flexible and sustainable revenue model. This isn’t about a one-time sale; it’s about creating continuous engagement and monetization.
How Copyright Might Evolve to Protect Creators
Generative AI is here to stay, and copyright law is likely to catch up. Here’s what we might see down the line:
Royalties for AI-Generated Works: Copyright laws could evolve to require royalties for creators whenever AI generates content based on their original work. This would provide an ongoing revenue stream and protect creators from exploitation.
Attribution Rights: Laws may mandate that AI companies disclose how creators’ work influences generated content, acknowledging and compensating the source of creativity.
Controlled Licensing Agreements: Future copyright might allow creators to set use-specific terms for AI training—such as limiting commercial use or requiring periodic licensing renewals—giving them more control over how their work is integrated into AI systems.
The Bottom Line: Don’t Settle for Short-Term Gains
Licensing your content to AI companies might seem like a quick win, but it risks selling out your work’s long-term value for a short-term payout. Instead of one-off deals, think long-term. Position your content to align with the way AI is evolving, from personalized feeds to tokenized marketplaces. Set yourself up for continuous engagement, ongoing royalties, and control over how your work shapes the AI of tomorrow.
Don’t let AI companies own your creativity for a one-time fee. Hold onto control, demand fair compensation, and future-proof your work to reap the benefits of the AI age on your terms.